Built against your CPS 230 obligations. Governed by the people who answer for it.
Generic tools don't understand your compliance environment, your PMO's risk language, or how a Big 4 banking program actually runs. They produce outputs that need to be corrected before anyone can act on them — and the team ends up curating instead of delivering.
The Banking & Finance Ops Agent is built for one program function, against that function's mission, by a firm whose primary practice is diagnosing why AI fails. It monitors program health, tracks CPS 230 compliance, scores risk automatically, and routes every decision back to the humans who own it — with reasoning and evidence attached.
Phase 1 demo available: a working prototype on synthetic data, no production system access required, in 4 weeks.
"Compliance reporting, program health synthesis, and risk escalation are absorbing hours that should be spent on delivery. The Banking & Finance Ops Agent handles the intelligence layer — freeing your team to act on it, not compile it." The pattern across Big 4 banking programs
Your Program Manager spends Sunday evening and Monday morning pulling data from Jira, Confluence, and ServiceNow, normalising it, and producing a program health brief before the 9am leadership stand-up.
The Banking & Finance Ops Agent runs automatically at 6:00 AM Monday, pulls all three systems simultaneously, synthesises the full program picture, scores the composite risk, and delivers a structured brief to the Program Manager's inbox before they reach their desk — with sources cited and confidence levels named.
Outcome: The Program Manager walks into Monday morning with the brief already done. The leadership stand-up runs on sharper intelligence, not manually assembled data.
CPS 230 operational risk obligations require continuous monitoring across material service providers, operational resilience requirements, and board-reportable incident thresholds. Manual tracking across a large program means obligations get missed — or flagged late.
The agent maps your program's activities against CPS 230 categories weekly, flags obligations approaching threshold, surfaces AT_RISK items to the Compliance Officer in a structured Teams brief, and records every classification in an audit-ready format for regulator review.
Outcome: Compliance obligations surface when they are still addressable — not when they become reportable incidents. The audit trail is ready before it is requested.
When a program scores HIGH risk — composite score of 7 or above across RAG, velocity, and blockers — the cost of a 24-hour delay in escalation is measurable. Manual handoffs between systems mean the right person sees the signal too late.
When the agent scores a HIGH risk result, it automatically prepares an escalation package — risk narrative, evidence, impacted workstreams, recommended response options — and routes it to the relevant decision-maker in Teams before the next stand-up, with no manual transfer required.
Outcome: HIGH risk conditions reach the decision-maker with full context in minutes, not hours. The response window is preserved.
Most agent builds skip phase one (no mission alignment), compress phase two (assumed workflows, not observed ones), and have no equivalent of phases four and five (built and released without the people who will use it ever signing off).
The Mycelium build loop is slower than the market default. The slowness is the point.
Fixed fee, ex GST. Optional Sustained Alignment Retainer ($3,500–$8,500/month) available post-release for quarterly mission re-alignment, CPS 230 obligation updates, drift monitoring, and governance review.
Every Banking & Finance Ops Agent is released to broader use only after three sign-offs.
This is what separates a managed build from a deployed tool. The agent is not finished when the code is written. It is finished when the people who will use it have signed off on what it does, what it doesn't do, and how its performance will be reviewed.
The Program Managers and analysts who will use the agent daily sign off that it works as expected, handles edge cases responsibly, and the CPS 230 flag logic aligns with your compliance obligations.
The function owner signs off on scope, governance cadence, performance measures, compliance boundaries, and the explicit list of what the agent will and will not do.
The budget holder receives the executive briefing, confirms the scope and risk envelope, reviews the CPS 230 compliance approach, and authorises broader release.
60 minutes with you and your executive sponsor. We assess whether a Banking & Finance Ops Agent build — or a Phase 1 demo — is the right move for your situation. And we tell you if it is not.