The governance practice that turns AI policy into evidence. Board papers, accountability matrices, registers and reporting cadences — built to the 14-Dimension framework and mapped to APRA CPS 230, CPS 234, AS ISO/IEC 42001 and AICD director-duty guidance.
If the question on the table is “can we show the regulator what we’re doing about AI?” — this is the practice.
You need a defensible AI governance posture before the next external review. The artefacts that come out of this practice sit on a board table without further translation.
You own AI risk in practice. You need the working tools — registers, policies, RACI, escalation playbooks — that survive Internal Audit and APRA scrutiny.
The governance practice delivers the full Govern pillar of the Mycelium framework — five dimensions, four artefacts per dimension, populated to your context.
Pick the depth that matches the board cycle and the calendar.
Two weeks. The diagnostic sweep across the Govern pillar plus a single board paper outlining where you sit and what to do first.
Eight weeks. The full Govern pillar built and populated — 20 artefacts across five dimensions — ready for AIGF approval and Internal Audit sampling.
Quarterly retainer. We attend AIGF, run the cadence, refresh registers, prepare board papers and represent governance to Internal Audit and external review.
Thirty minutes. No pitch. No proposal until it makes sense.
Book a diagnostic